My husband, Zach, is a Montessori alumnus. He attended Montessori starting at age 3 through 6th grade, then transitioned into the local public school system. I’d like to use him as an anecdotal example in this post.
Zach is a bit of an anomaly. He is incredibly smart in many areas, but was a late bloomer, at least when it came to reading. He didn’t read well until the 2nd or 3rd grade. But, as Montessorians often know to expect, at some point in that year something “clicked on” and he began reading voraciously– his sensitive period for reading was just a bit later than most children. He was soon reading chapter books, and by 5th grade was reading at a high school level. In high school he probably learned more from his independent reading than from school. He continues to read everything from science fiction to science journals and everything in between, and is one of the best-read people I know.
Let’s contrast this with another learned skill – handwriting. Zach never had very good handwriting. In Montessori, where little is ever “assigned,” he was assigned calligraphy work, most likely because his handwriting was near illegible. He hated calligraphy and handwriting in general. To this day he still dislikes having to write anything by hand, and rejoices in the fact that almost everything can instead be typed on an electronic device.
Compare these two scenarios: he was a late bloomer with reading, but allowed to develop the skill at his own pace and eventually blossomed into a life-long voracious reader. But he was forced to work on handwriting against his will, and even today still holds a deep disdain for writing by hand.
Does this sound familiar? How many of us who attended traditional schooling disliked reading since school had turned it into a boring chore? The idea of reading “for fun” was laughable. I fear many children are turned off the joys of reading because of the way it is assigned. I realize Zach’s example is a bit extreme, but the underlying principle holds true for most of us. Assigning a child to work on a particular subject when she is neither interested nor ready for it may result in a superficial learning of that subject, which will be quickly forgotten (unlike the deeper lesson that the subject itself was “boring” and “hard”). If we wait until the child develops an interest for that subject, however, she will likely devote hours to it without being asked simply because it is fun, and the learning that takes place will be deeper and much more meaningful.
The magic of Montessori lies in having every option available to the child, while waiting for them to become interested in it. If we push too early, we risk damaging their interest in that particular skill or subject. But allow them to follow their own interest, and it may blossom and grow.
Marcy Hogan holds a Primary diploma from AMI. She lives in Sacramento, CA, along with her husband and two sons. She also writes about parenting and life in general on her blog, Life is Good.


Thank you. So true, so true! And there is so much time and there are so many ways to stud that time with glittering enticements for activities that promote skills leading to reading, that set the stage for taking on related challenges, that motivate the desire for particular aspects of preparedness for reading. It is foolish to assign! More later . . . Donna Bryant Goertz
Donna– I wonder if you might recognize Zach? The Montessori elementary he attended was AMS. ; ) (He would have been there from about 1985-1990 or so)
For more brain-based discussion on this, I highly recommend “The Mislabled Child” by Drs. Fernette and Brock Eide. They also discuss this late blooming effect in gifted children in several places on the internet. Just search for their names and “gifted.” The more we know about different brain patterns, the better prepared we will be to give appropriate support.
Marcy,
Thank you for this blog post. I am wondering why Zach was “assigned” calligraphy work (something you might see in a traditional school environment but not montessori), yet he was allowed the freedom to bloom in his own time with reading? This is a reminder of how gentle, sensitive and aware our directresses/directors need to be at all times in their approach to guiding the children in their classrooms.
Aidan McAuley
Montessorimadmen.com
Aidan- I’m not sure, my guess is his handwriting may have been bad enough that it was almost unreadable and that may have been the reason for pushing that more?
I, too, had terrible handwriting, a fact that was reinforced at the elementary level by being forbidden to write with a pen until the 6th grade! I suspect that this was my teachers’ attempt to motivate me to focus on handwriting skills by doing the same drills with the same materials ad infinitum, so as to avoid ostracism from my peers. I’m still not very good at handwriting, despite these herculean efforts by the brave nuns at Saint Peter’s Elementary School, and I suspect that, unlike reading, beautiful handwriting is not something that can be attributed to ‘late bloomerhood’!
Why calligraphy for a struggling writer? I suspect that by shifting the mode from the utilitarian to the creative, the guide sought to help Zach to develop small motor facility, to express himself creatively, and to see that writing could be more than simply placing words on paper, that it too could be an imaginative endeavor, and a reflection of his second plane characteristics for communication, creativity, and language.
I’m not in favor of questioning memories, but the tendency to assign work like calligraphy is, at least in theory, anathema to my concept of a well-functioning Montessori Elementary classroom. Having taught science at the secondary level for 15 years prior to my leap of faith into Montessori (at age 52), I’ve seen the light go out of too many eyes when given ‘assignments’ that are more representative of the work of the adult rather than the work of the child, like endless worksheets and review exercises for State Mandated Proficiency testing. By interacting with Montessori children from 18 months to 18 years of age here in Cleveland, I’ve noticed that the light, the spark, the enthusiasm for learning is largely undimmed at all levels of the Montessori environment, and my own journey began.
There may be a lesson here. Often children seek approval and praise from adults, and a suggestion from the guide may have the force of ‘assignment’ in the eyes of the child. Adults in the Montessori classroom must be ever vigilant in facilitating the child’s work, rather than imposing their own framework for ensuring the child’s development.
Hello, I’ve only discovered the Montessori theory, but believe in this with all my heart. When my youngest was born, this is how I brought him up as he was my third I understood for some reason the concept that each human being is born with an ability in something and if you give them enough experience they will find the interest and ability on their own. As I initially wrote I used this method without really being instructed, just instinctively knew and my son has shown what wonderful gifts he brings to everyone and how he looks at life, which is far above the way I l look at life.
I teach in an FE college and try to use some of this theory but many people do not understand what I mean.
I’m doing a degree at the moment, very late in life but regret that education was not available to me through restriction and peoples beliefs.
Kind regards
Melanie Jones